Lobbyists' anger over 'pointless' recycling survey
0 Comments | Express & Echo; Exeter (UK), May 14, 2010
A CAMPAIGN group has criticised Exeter City Council for spending Pounds 40,000 on a survey, then ignoring its results.
The three-month survey, paid for by the Government, was designed to find out what method works best for getting residents to recycle more and put less “contaminated waste” in recycling bins.
The answer was that going door to door and speaking to residents is the best method — it resulted in a significant reduction in the amount of wrong materials being put into green bins. However, this method is costly, so instead recycling chiefs are to improve the information about waste on the council’s website and concentrate on “education at grass roots level”.
The Taxpayers’ Alliance called the survey a waste of time and “pointless”.
With the city’s recycling figures remaining static this year at just under 37 per cent, recycling bosses had been keenly awaiting the survey results.
Mike Trim, the city’s head of cleansing services, said the survey results had not been a surprise.
He said: “It told us more or less what we always thought. Talking to people face to face produces better results and once officers do door knocking things improve in the short term but we don’t yet know how long that will be maintained.
“However this method is very costly — we only have one education and enforcement officer so obviously he can’t go around the whole city.
“We have put out a huge amount of information and advice and while there is a lot already on the city council’s website, we will be seeking to improve what’s there.”
Mr Trim added that the Exeter schools in the Green Team scheme also had a part to play.
The Green Teams encourage recycling in their schools and Mr Trim said: “This is like planting an acorn and hoping that the children will take home to their parents what they learn about recycling at school, real grass roots level education.”
But Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “There was no point spending money on this consultation if the council were simply going to go and do something else. Public consultations have a really bad reputation because this is what happens all the time — politicians or bureaucrats like to say they’re asking the people, but actually they’re just doing it for show.”